The
35-105mm was Nikon’s first variable aperture lens, but compared to the modern
lenses it does not lose a lot of light. Rather than closing down to f/5.6 at the
maximum zoom range, it closes down to f/4.5. Besides the useful focal range
(especially on film / full frame) it is also capable of a reproduction ration
of 1:4. So this seems like an interesting lens. And to be honest that’s the
reason I bought it, because I was curious and not because I needed it.
Of course
this is an older zoom lens, which means that the quality is not comparable to
current Nikkor zoom lenses. However the image quality is surprising, the lens
is far more usable than I anticipated. If you punish this lens it does show its
shortcomings, but if you are aware of them you can make pretty good use of this
lens. So one of the things you should not expect this lens is to produce good
image quality when you are focused on infinity and you use a wide open aperture.
Then the image becomes muddy and it reminds a bit of a smart phone image. However,
if you close down one stop and try not to be at the extremes of the focal
length you can get a very acceptable image. On a scale of 1 to 10 I would give
it a 6.5 or 7 while the 50mm would get a 10. So if I want an extremely sharp image
for a large print I would not use this lens. And I will probably never take it
when I go out to make landscape photographs.
However the
lens is quite sharp when you focus a bit closer. The normal focus ring allows
you to focus up to 1.4 meters, but there is also a macro ring. Depending on
your focal range you can get a magnification of 1:4 (35mm) or 1:5.5 (105mm).
And the images I got out of that mode are very good. Again, on a scale of 1 to
10 I would give it an 8. And since we discuss close-up photography we might as
well discuss bokeh. The bokeh of the lens is alright, it is not really bad but
also nothing outstanding. The aperture blades are not curved so you can see the
aperture blades back in the bokeh highlights. Normally I don’t find it
distracting but with this lens it can be a bit distracting from time to time
depending on the actual aperture you use. But if you have less out of focus
highlights, shoot at an aperture which suits the bokeh the bokeh is quite nice.
The area which is closest to the focus point can be a bit distracting depending
on the background, but generally it looks good.
As you can see, the ground which is only just out of focus is a bit busy. But besides that I like the bokeh in this photograph |
This lens
flares quite easily. If you can find an appropriate lens hood you should use it
to avoid unwanted flare. But the flare of this lens is quite beautiful, it
shows that this lens contains out of a lot of lens elements. You can control
the flare to a certain extend by zooming a bit in or out. Zooming just a bit
can change the look of the flare dramatically and I you have the time it is
worthwhile to experiment with the best focal range. Of course this lens has
other short comings as well. It has quite some distortion I’ve read on other
websites. But until now it hasn’t bothered me that much. I have to admit, I do
not shoot architecture, but the distortion isn’t too obvious and I generally do
not correct for it. Another issue this lens apparently has is vignetting. After
all, it’s an old zoom. But I have not noticed it yet. I’m sure there is some,
but it hasn’t bothered me yet even though I don’t like it if you can see
imperfections in my photographs which were not intended for the viewer to see.
(flare on the other hand can be a nice creative tool)
So I’ve
discussed the image quality of this lens, but I don’t think that’s the most
important I like about this lens. I have sharper lenses. But the thing about
this lens is that it gives reasonable image quality while also being very
versatile. You can focus reasonably close and the focus is just nice, it’s the
classic Nikkor quality. I like the focal range on DX (but that’s because I don’t
like shooting with lenses wider than 28 on DX) especially for a general
walk-around lens. It has a 52mm filter thread which is shared with a lot of
other Nikkor lenses. And the build quality is just great. The main quality of
this lens is the handling. Of course I can get better image quality by shooting
with a modern zoom or a prime, but there’s just something about this lens that
keeps making me use it. Because what’s image quality worth when your photos
suck? I really like my primes, and I think that they help me to see better
photos. But from time to time you just want a zoom, and then I pick this lens
of the shelf.
This is a fantastic lens and a steal for what it sells for today. build quality is outstanding and it's sharp at all focal lengths compared to the 35-70 AF D. A must have for the street shooter. great review!
BeantwoordenVerwijderenI love this lens, especially in regard to a richness of color that's especially lovely in medium-to-low light natural settings.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenthanks for the review i just got one and it helped me to read you experience..
BeantwoordenVerwijderen